Morbidity and mortality trends of Covid 19 in top 10 countries.

The present article highlights morbidity and mortality trends of Covid 19 in the last 3 months in top 10 countries of the world. In spite of efforts being undertaken, all countries are showing an increasing trend in terms of morbidity and mortality. The order of countries in terms of mortality and morbidity has changed in the last 3 months. Various efforts are being undertaken by WHO and other agencies world over including the vaccine development initiative.

Lessons to be learnt from 100 year old 1918 influenza pandemic viz a viz 2019 corona pandemic with an eye on NTEP.

The article is about the 1918 H1N1 flu pandemic also called the "Spanish flu" which killed 50 million plus people worldwide, and the coronavirus pandemic (Covid-19) which has spread in the world at an alarming pace. As of now there are 11,327,790 cases and 532,340 deaths globally. Aim of this article is to draw conclusions and share knowledge from both the pandemics and apply these lessons in other health programmes.

Laboratory diagnosis of novel corona virus (2019-nCoV)-present and the future.

BACKGROUND: In December 2019 a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 emerged in the Hunan seafood market in Wuhan, China, and soon became a global health problem. Since its outbreak, SARS-CoV-2 has had a major impact on clinical diagnostic laboratories. The scientific community has quickly risen to the occasion and reports of new developments have arrived at an unprecedented scale. At present, there is a growing list of over 400 SARC-CoV-2 diagnostic tests either in development or approved for clinical use. This presentation reviews the current laboratory methods available for testing COVID- 19 in microbiology laboratories and also provides an insight into the future diagnostics approaches. METHODS: Proper respiratory specimen collected at the appropriate time and from the right anatomical site is critical in the accurate and timely diagnosis of SARSCoV2. While oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs are recommended for the detection of early infection, other lower respiratory tract specimens like the sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage are used for late detection and monitoring of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Real-time RT-PCR based molecular assay remains the test of choice for the etiological diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 while serological tests are being introduced as supplementary tools. Finally, there is an urgent need for scaling up the diagnostic capacity by the introduction of reliable and accurate point-of-care tests which will assist in effective control of this outbreak. These assays can be used in the local hospitals and clinics bearing the burden of identifying and treating patients.

Benefits and limitations of serological assays in COVID-19 infection.

Accurate and rapid diagnostic tests are critical for achieving control of coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19), a pandemic illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Diagnostic tests for covid-19 fall into two main categories: molecular tests that detect viral RNA, and serological tests that detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), a molecular test, has become the gold standard for diagnosis of covid-19; however, this test has many limitations that include potential false negative results, changes in diagnostic accuracy over the disease course, and precarious availability of test materials. Serological tests have generated substantial interest as an alternative or complement to RT-PCR and other Nucleic acid tests in the diagnosis of acute infection, as some might be cheaper and easier to implement at the point of care. A clear advantage of these tests over RT-PCR is that they can identify individuals previously infected by SARS-CoV-2, even if they never underwent testing while acutely ill. Many serological tests for covid-19 have become available in a short period, including some marketed for use as rapid, point-of-care tests. The pace of development has, however, exceeded that of rigorous evaluation, and important uncertainty about test accuracy remains.

Tuberculosis: Newer diagnostic tests: Applications and limitations.

A public health worry as is Tuberculosis (TB) has been making more than 10 million people globally suffer from its terror and causing more than 2 million people worldwide to lose their lives every year. Mankind is putting all its efforts, since the discovery of the causative bacilli, to come up with some dramatic improvements in providing high-quality TB diagnostic services. Nevertheless, it poses a challenge and many people with TB remain use only smear microscopy for diagnosis. In an environment where transmission is becoming easier by the day the challenge becomes burdensome once disease gets associated with drug resistance, HIV, other diseases, etc. It becomes of paramount importance to address this biggest public health challenge delivering timely diagnosis using advanced technologies. Initial microscopic examination forms the backbone of TB diagnosis since 100 years along with clinical confirmations. Newer advanced diagnostic tools coming into play are genotypic assays (LPA, CBNAAT, LAMP) that are rapid molecular tests, and culture methods (liquid culture media) with standard drug susceptibility testing assays. Program ideates to correlate these rapid molecular diagnostics with turn-around time (TAT) as low as around 2 hours, with conventional standard methods. These help in reinforcing the diagnostic capacities and also provide identification of drug resistance patterns for few most important first line and second line drugs. The present day developments have brought these tests to near-patient point of care. Culture tests (liquid culture media) are gold standard technique for the analysis of TB with its increased sensitivity and highest quality over all others. An on-going search under TB diagnostics is to find an efficient, reproducible, cost effective tool with minimal infrastructure requirements. This review conveys the advances made over the past decades in the diagnosis of the disease and drug resistance.

Covid-19 and social stigma: Role of scientific community.

COVID-19 has led to stigma and discrimination among various groups of people in different populations. Healthcare workers caring for those affected by COVID-19,3 people who have recovered from COVID-19,4 those belonging to lower socioeconomic groups, those having particular religious and racial identities have all been at the receiving end of the discrimination. COVID-19 has led to reinforcement of preexisting stereotypes against various groups. For instance, in Italy, in weeks before the national lockdown started, a state of emergency was declared but everyday life was going on as always, the sentiment toward the Chinese community changed: their restaurants were left empty, more and more parents did not want their children to go to school if they had a Chinese classmate, and a high-profile politician said on TV that 'we have all seen them eat live mice'.